Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 MAY 2015

Lessons from recent chain of responsibility cases for road transport operators and consignors

Cooper Grace Ward
Cooper Grace Ward
Contributor
Cooper Grace Ward

Cooper Grace Ward

Cooper Grace Ward was established in 1980 and has quickly become one of the largest independent...

View firm profile
Explore more from Cooper Grace Ward

Courts are willing to impose heavy penalties when operators do not have proper systems and practices of load restraint.

AustraliaTransport

Two recent New South Wales Supreme Court decisions provide important lessons for road transport operators and consignors on their liability under chain of responsibility laws.

Kemp v Doble, Kemp v Doble Express Transport Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 785

Kemp v Air Liquide Australia Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1200

Air Liquide (the consignor) engaged Doble Express (the operator) to collect a full gas cylinder from Air Liquide and deliver it to Oakley Winery, and to then collect empty gas cylinders from Oakley Winery. Doble Express, using a Volvo rigid truck and a single axle pig trailer, first collected the five empty gas cylinders, weighing approximately 3.5 tonnes. Its driver restrained the cylinders using a single 2,500 kg synthetic ratchet strap. No anti-slip material or dunnage was placed between the base of each cylinder and the deck of the trailer.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from