Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 JUNE 2014

Heavy penalties for overloaded vehicles: failure to establish a ‘reasonable steps’ defence

Cooper Grace Ward
Cooper Grace Ward
Contributor
Cooper Grace Ward

Cooper Grace Ward

Cooper Grace Ward was established in 1980 and has quickly become one of the largest independent...

View firm profile
Explore more from Cooper Grace Ward

The New South Wales courts have provided useful guidance on the 'reasonable steps' defence for overloading vehicles.

AustraliaTransport

Western Freight Management Pty Ltd v Roads and Maritime Services [2014] NSWCA 132 (22 April 2014)

A penalty notice for $853 for overloading issued by New South Wales Roads and Maritime Services has recently ended up the subject of argument in the Court of Appeal in New South Wales. In the process, the New South Wales Supreme Court and Court of Appeal have provided useful guidance on the 'reasonable steps' defence.

Transport operators would be aware that so called 'chain of responsibility' legislation has, for some time, provided that operators and others in the transport supply chain are guilty of certain offences in relation to mass, dimensions or load restraint unless they can establish that they took 'all reasonable steps' to prevent the contravention.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from