Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 APRIL 2016

Mossack Fonseca, Panama and the implications for Australia

Taxpayers should scrutinise any offshore affairs and respond to regulatory scrutiny through strategic and measured means.

AustraliaTax
Sean Mullins (Formerly With Clayton Utz)
Sean Mullins (Formerly With Clayton Utz)
Author LinkedIn connections

Key Points:

Australian corporate and individual taxpayers should be scrutinising their own offshore affairs and be able to effectively respond to regulatory scrutiny through strategic and measured means.

The 2.6 terabyte leaking of information from the law firm, Mossack Fonseca, in Panama (known as the Panama Papers) could be a significant issue for hundreds of Australian tax payers who may directly or indirectly have interests in offshore structures set up by the firm. These could include entities and trusts that the Panama law firm was instrumental in setting up in the British Virgin Islands (BVI), Panama, Seychelles, the Bahamas and Samoa. While the use of offshore structures in jurisdictions with high financial secrecy is in many circumstances legitimate they are susceptible to abuse by corrupt individuals or entities.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from