Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 JULY 2014

You really must properly read your government briefs

The Federal Court provided a timely reminder to government decision-makers to diligently consider briefing materials.

AustraliaStrategy

Koowarta v State of Queensland (Wild Rivers)

The Federal Court has provided a timely reminder to government decision-makers – particularly ministers – to diligently consider briefing materials when exercising their powers.

Most of the public attention received by Justice Greenwood's decision about three declarations made by the Queensland Government over three rivers in Cape York (under the Wild Rivers Act 2005 (Qld) (Act)) was due to the role of the widow of land rights campaigner, John Koowarta, in helping to bring the case.

However, for agencies, the real importance of the decision lies in the salutary lesson for decision-makers to properly understand the statutory pre-conditions that may be required to be satisfied before making a decision. The case also highlights a growing problem for government in making decisions on high-profile issues that have attracted large numbers of "pro forma" submissions.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from