Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 SEPTEMBER 2003

Finally—one for software licensors

AustraliaStrategy
Amalia Stone
Amalia Stone

There have been a number of recent cases1 in which software licensors have been held liable for differences between customer expectations and delivered software. Armchair viewers might be forgiven for thinking that now is not a good time (legally speaking, leaving aside downturns in the IT sector) to be a software licensor. However, the tides do seem to be turning.

In MLW Technology v May & Ors2 the licensee claimed that the licensor had repudiated the licence because:

  • not all source code for the software had been provided on the commencement date (although it was provided within a number of months)
  • the software would not operate with the compiler the licensee was using, and to purchase a copy of the compiler that the licensor used would have cost about $10,000. Instead, the licensee revised the software, so that it would work with a different compiler

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from