Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 APRIL 2012

Accountant not liable for investment advice

The NSW Supreme Court held that the accountant was not liable for the investment losses suffered by its client.

AustraliaStrategy
Maddalena Del Vecchio
Maddalena Del Vecchio
Author LinkedIn connections

Tomasetti v Brailey [2011] NSWSC 1446

Introduction

The NSW Supreme Court has held that an accountant was not liable for investment losses suffered by its client.

Background

The plaintiffs are Mr Tomasetti SC, a barrister who practices commercial law, property, equity, and in the Land and Environment Court, his partner, and the corporate trustee of their superannuation fund. Tomasetti sought advice from Brailey, his accountant, as to how to reduce his taxation burden.

In 2000, Brailey recommended Tomasetti invest in four agricultural managed investment schemes which provided deductions which operated to reduce his liability to pay income taxation. Tomasetti accepted the recommendation / advice and caused each plaintiff to invest in the schemes between 2000 and 2005. Brailey provided Tomasetti with prospectuses each year prior to Tomasetti investing. Brailey specifically directed Tomasetti to the provisions within each prospectus which detailed the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from