Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 NOVEMBER 2012

Unpaid Infrastructure Charges – A Continuing Development Offence Which Attaches To Land

The developers could have discovered the outstanding infrastructure charges by obtaining a full development certificate.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction

The recent Planning & Environment Court decision of Montrose Creek Pty Ltd and Manningtree v BCC serves as a valuable reminder why skimping on due diligence is not worth the risk.

The matter concerned a mixed use development located in Keperra that Brisbane City Council approved for Opal Wing Pty Ltd. The approved use commenced and the site was subsequently purchased by Manningtree and Montrose. The Development Permit included a standard condition requiring the payment of infrastructure contributions prior to the use commencing. In September 2010, Council discovered that an amount of over $400,000 in infrastructure contributions remained outstanding for the site. Council initially pursued Opal Wing but it entered into voluntary liquidation. Council then pursued Manningtree and Montrose for the outstanding infrastructure contributions. A Show Cause Notice was issued, followed by an Enforcement Notice served on the basis that the failure to pay the outstanding

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from