Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 MAY 2025

Straying from the plan: Lessons from Lendlease vs Mount Gilead

Holding Redlich
Holding Redlich
Contributor
Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich is a large national commercial firm with offices in Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Holding Redlich

Lendlease Communities (Figtree Hill) Pty Ltd v Mount Gilead Pty Ltd (No 3) [2025] NSWSC 334.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction

The recent judgement of the Supreme Court of New South Wales (the Court) in Lendlease Communities (Figtree Hill) Pty Ltd v Mount Gilead Pty Ltd (No 3) [2025] NSWSC 334 (Mount Gilead No 3) serves as a cautionary reminder that strict adherence to the conditions precedent is required when exercising a put or call option. Otherwise, the right to exercise that option will not arise.

The proceedings concerned an agreement entitled 'Irrevocable Offers Deed Balance Land, Mt Gilead' (Deed) for the purchase of Lots 6 to 10 (Balance Land) entered between the plaintiff and members of the Lendlease group (Lendlease) and Mount Gilead Pty Limited and Mount Gilead (Access) Pty Ltd (together, the Landowners).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

This publication does not deal with every important topic or change in law and is not intended to be relied upon as a substitute for legal or other advice that may be relevant to the reader's specific circumstances. If you have found this publication of interest and would like to know more or wish to obtain legal advice relevant to your circumstances please contact one of the named individuals listed.

See more popular content from