Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 JUNE 2017

Securing contractual rights destroys mutuality and right to claim set-off

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

This decision impacts the negotiation and drafting of contracts, and the security granted over rights under a contract.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction

The recent WA Supreme Court decision of Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd v Forge Group Power Pty ltd (in Liquidation) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) [2017] WASC 152 illustrates the risk of relying on contractual and statutory set-offs where the counterparty has granted security to lenders in an insolvency situation.

The Court held that mutuality was destroyed, and that contractual and insolvency set-off were unavailable to a counterparty to a construction contract, where the other party secured its rights under the contract to a financier. This decision will impact the negotiation and drafting of contracts in the future, as well as how and what security is granted over rights under a contract.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from