Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 DECEMBER 2011

Retail lease disputes: Rethinking Mediation before proceedings?

A recent court decision may change the approach of mediation of disputes under the Retail Leases Act. 1994</em> (NSW).

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction
Bruce Hale
Bruce Hale

The recent Supreme Court decision in Fordham Laboratories Pty Ltd v Sor and Anor1 (Fordham's Case) gives cause to rethink the 'default' approach of mediation of disputes under the Retail Leases Act 1994 (NSW) (the Act).

Mediation and the Administrative Decisions Tribunal

Much of the procedure for determining retail lease disputes in NSW is governed by the Act, being intended to address a perceived imbalance of economic power between landlord and retail tenant and to ensure that there is no improper exercise of such power by landlords. It is therefore unsurprising that the Act contains specific provisions concerning mediation and the referral of retail tenancy disputes to a specialist Tribunal, namely the retail Leases Division of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal (Tribunal).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from