Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 AUGUST 2025

Residential Focus: HBCF eligibility decisions – too challenging to challenge?

Holding Redlich
Holding Redlich
Contributor
Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich is a large national commercial firm with offices in Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Holding Redlich

NSW SC rejected builder's challenge to Home Building Compensation Fund eligibility decision, highlighting the limited avenues for contesting such determinations.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction

In what seems to be the first decision of its kind, the Supreme Court has, in Introbuild Constructions Pty Ltd v Insurance and Care NSW [2025] NSWSC 773, rejected a builder's judicial review challenge to a Home Building Compensation Fund (HBCF) eligibility decision.

With no administrative review pathway provided in the legislation, the decision suggests that there is little effective means of challenging eligibility decisions.

Facts of the case – Introbuild Constructions Pty Ltd v Insurance and Care NSW [2025] NSWSC 773

The plaintiff was a contractor required to have a policy of insurance under the Home Building Compensation Fund Insurance (HBCF insurance) in order to enter into residential building contracts exceeding $20,000, under section 92 of the Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) (HBA).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

This publication does not deal with every important topic or change in law and is not intended to be relied upon as a substitute for legal or other advice that may be relevant to the reader's specific circumstances. If you have found this publication of interest and would like to know more or wish to obtain legal advice relevant to your circumstances please contact one of the named individuals listed.

See more popular content from