Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 MARCH 2018

Residential Focus - 28 February 2018: Part 1 - Adjudication determinations

Holding Redlich
Holding Redlich
Contributor
Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich is a large national commercial firm with offices in Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Holding Redlich

The courts do not have jurisdiction to quash adjudication determinations for non-jurisdictional errors of law.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction

High Court rejects judicial review in the Probuild and Maxcon decisions - what does this mean in the residential space?

Probuild

The recent High Court decision in Probuild Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd v Shade Systems Pty Ltd [2018] HCA 4 (Probuild) has affirmed the position that had previously been understood to apply for many years in NSW, that judicial review of an adjudication determination under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) (SOPA) is available for jurisdictional error, but not for non-jurisdictional error of law on the face of the record.

This means that parties to adjudications in the residential space, such as owners corporations and developers, left discontent by erroneous adjudication determinations, will continue to have very limited options by way of challenge, remembering that the SOPA exemption for residential building work only carves out contracts with principals for work on premises on which the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from