Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JULY 2016

Residential Focus - 13 July 2016

Holding Redlich
Holding Redlich
Contributor
Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich is a large national commercial firm with offices in Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Holding Redlich

We discuss a recent decision on a claim to recover money from a sub-contractor.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction
Macquarie Grove Homes Pty Ltd v Tony Aylott & Glen Aylott t/as T&G Bricklaying; Tony Aylott & Glen Aylott t/as T&G Bricklaying v Macquarie Grove Homes Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCATAP 142

In this edition we look at a decision of the Appeal Panel arising from a claim to recover money from a sub-contractor following breach of the statutory warranties in s 18B of the Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) (the Act).

The Builder sought to recover from the Sub-contractor an amount that the Builder had, by consent, in separate proceedings agreed to pay the homeowners for defective work allegedly carried out by the Sub-contractor. In the Tribunal below it was held that the Builder was entitled to recover the sum of $26,364 but was not entitled to legal costs as they were too remote. The Builder appealed the costs decision. The Sub-contractor also appealed.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from