Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 MARCH 2021

Questionable construction adjudication decision against you?

What needs to be proven in order to prevent an adjudication decision being enforced before the court makes its determination.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction

It is well known that a security of payment adjudication decision can be challenged in Court for jurisdictional error. This article looks at what needs to be proven in order to prevent an adjudication decision being enforced before the Court makes its determination.

The recent Supreme Court decision in Karam Group Pty Ltd v Earthmoving Contractors Pty Ltd deals with the common circumstance where an interim injunction is sought while an alleged jurisdictional error of an adjudicator is determined by the Court. The case deals with whether or not recent views of the High Court preclude an injunction so that money would flow regardless, leaving a respondent to bear the risk of non-repayment should it ultimately be successful in its challenge of the decision.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from