Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 JULY 2017

Non-commercial uses and the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic)

Holding Redlich
Holding Redlich
Contributor
Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich is a large national commercial firm with offices in Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Holding Redlich

Premises used for a cold and cool storage business were defined as 'retail premises' for the purposes of the RLA.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction

A recent decision of the Victorian Supreme Court of Appeal serves as an important reminder of the broad application of the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic) (RLA).

In IMCC Group (Australia) Pty Ltd v CB Cold Storage Pty Ltd [2017] VSCA, the Victorian Supreme Court of Appeal upheld an earlier decision of the Victorian Supreme Court, finding that premises used for a cold and cool storage business fell within the definition of 'retail premises' for the purposes of the RLA. The case turned on whether the premises were used for the 'retail provision of services'.

Background

In 2012, CB Storage Pty Ltd (the Tenant) entered into a lease with IMCC Group (Australia) Pty Ltd (the Landlord) for a lease of a property in Laverton (the Lease). The permitted use defined in the Lease was 'Cold and cool storage warehouse and transport facility'.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from