Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 OCTOBER 2011

Mediation may not be mandatory before commencing retail lease proceedings

Courts can hear retail shop lease disputes where they are satisfied that mediation is unlikely to resolve the disputes.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction
Faith Laube
Faith Laube

In brief - Mediation may not be necessary if it would not resolve the dispute

In Fordham Laboratories Pty Limited v Sor & Anor, the New South Wales Supreme Court held that mediation is not necessary before commencing an action under the Retail Leases Act if the court is satisfied that mediation would not resolve the dispute. However, mediation is normally a necessary step where it may resolve the dispute. Courts should normally stay proceedings until mediation occurs.

This means that in certain circumstances you may not have to do mediation before commencing proceedings under the Retail Leases Act.

Fordham Laboratories Pty Limited v Sor & Anor [2011] NSWSC 706

In 2003 Fordham Laboratories leased retail premises in South Camden to Kim-Po Sor and Vattanak Im for a period of three years with an option to renew the lease for two further three-year terms. Kim-Po Sor and Vattanak Im took up the first option and continued their lease for the further three years.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from