Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 JANUARY 2017

Limited grounds to review adjudication determinations — non-jurisdictional error not available

Parties with a non-jurisdictional error of law made by an adjudicator are not able to have the determination set aside.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction

The NSW Court of Appeal has ruled that an adjudicator's determination may only be subject to review for a jurisdictional error of law under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) in the decision of Shade Systems Pty Ltd v Probuild Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] NSWCA 379 (Shade Systems), handed down in late December 2016. Consequentially, parties who fall victim to a non-jurisdictional error of law made by an adjudicator will not be entitled to have a determination set aside. Instead they will have to rely upon their contractual and other legal rights to resolve disputes outside of the Security of Payment Act.

Background

Shade Systems was contracted to complete works for Probuild. It made a payment claim and in turn Probuild provided a payment schedule, which stated that Shade Systems was not entitled to the amounts claimed. This was because a greater amount was owed from Shade Systems to Probuild for liquidated

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from