Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 SEPTEMBER 2011

Lessons for Landlords: Unconscionable Conduct and Permitted Use Provisions

What are the key issues that landlords need to be aware of when negotiating retail leases?

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction

The recent decision in the NSW Court of Appeal (World Best Holdings v Sarker (2010)) highlighted some of the issues that landlords need to be aware of when negotiating and fulfilling retail leases.

Permitted Use Provisions 

The case concerned a retail lease in a shopping mall which provided that the tenant could use the premises as an 'Asian grocery shop'. The landlord thought that this did not entitle the tenant to sell Indian groceries and halal meats, and subsequently sought to terminate the lease when he realised this was happening by issuing notices for breach of the permitted use provision.  

The Court of Appeal held that the term 'Asian' included all nations within that continent, and that since India was such a nation, there was no breach by the tenant in selling Indian groceries. This resulted in the notice of termination being ineffective, and the landlord being held liable for damages to the tenant.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from