Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 MAY 2023

Lease incentives: When is a claw back considered unenforceable?

Piper Alderman
Piper Alderman
Contributor
Piper Alderman

Piper Alderman

Helping shape the future of business in Australia with practical, commercial and cutting-edge legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Piper Alderman

If the claw back right went further than necessary to protect the landlord's interests, it was considered unenforceable.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction

In the context of commercial leasing, consideration should be given to what would constitute a penalty versus a genuine pre-estimate of damage for the purposes of enabling a landlord to lawfully claw back a proportion of an incentive where a tenant is in breach of its leasing obligations.

Incentives are becoming more prominent in office leasing transactions with demand for office space continuing to soften following the pandemic which has pushed businesses to rapidly adopt new behaviours with respect to remote work. This has, in some jurisdictions in Australia, precipitated lower effective rents (and higher lease incentives for tenants in the form of rent reductions or fit-out contributions).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from