Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 JULY 2016

Krongold Constructions (Aust) V SR & RS Wales [2016] VSC 94

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Simply accepting a contractor's assessment on the basis that it is not unreasonable or excessive is insufficient.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction

KEYWORDS: SECURITY OF PAYMENT ACT; IDENTIFYING WORKS; VALUATION PROCESS

KEY TAKEAWAY

This case confirms the contractor's obligation to ensure that work the subject of a payment claim is sufficiently identifiable to the principal. Further, it clarifies the adjudicator's burden to apply a reasonable valuation process when assessing a payment claim, and to demonstrate how this process aligns with the requirements of the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2002 (Vic) (Act).

Simply accepting a contractor's assessment on the basis that it is not unreasonable or excessive is insufficient.

Facts

Krongold Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd (Krongold) was engaged to construct a restaurant at a winery in Healesville. Krongold met with SR & RS Wales (Wales) to discuss civil works required for the project. The parties then executed a contract for the works (Contract) with the minutes from the pre-contractual meeting annexed to the Contract (Minutes).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from