Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JANUARY 2018

Is your bank guarantee as unconditional as you think?

Holding Redlich
Holding Redlich
Contributor
Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich is a large national commercial firm with offices in Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Holding Redlich

Care needs to be taken to ensure that if the beneficiary wants guarantees to be truly unconditional, this must be clear.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction

Case Summary: Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd v Laing O'Rourke Australia Construction Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCA 291

Bank guarantees (and other instruments such as insurance bonds) are frequently used in construction projects to secure the contractor's obligations. These guarantees have proven to be very effective and generally unable to be challenged by a contractor seeking to resist a call on the guarantee (through an injunction) by the principal. However, a recent Court of Appeal decision has shown that bank guarantees are not always immune from such challenges.

The Kawasaki Case

Background

This case involved an appeal against an interlocutory injunction that was given in the primary judgement, which prevented Kawasaki from calling on surety bonds provided to it by Laing O'Rourke (LOR).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from