Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 JULY 2016

Interpretation of development approvals and calculation of infrastructure charges

Walter Elliott Holdings has applied to the High Court for special leave to appeal against the Court of Appeal's decision.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction

Walter Elliott Holdings Pty Ltd v Fraser Coast Regional Council [2015] QPEC 8 (Walter Elliott Holdings No 1) and Fraser Coast Regional Council v Walter Elliott Holdings Pty Ltd [2016] QCA 19 (Walter Elliott Holdings No 2) concerned an application for declaratory relief involving the calculation of infrastructure charges in respect of a relocatable home park. The adopted infrastructure charge was greater for a three bedroom home than for a two bedroom home and at issue was whether the approval permitted only two bedroom homes, or whether it could be construed as permitting three bedroom homes.

In Walter Elliott Holdings No 1, the Planning and Environment Court held that, properly construed, the development approval was for two bedroom dwellings. The judgment in Walter Elliott Holdings No 1 was reversed by the Queensland Court of Appeal in Walter Elliott Holdings No 2.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from