Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 MAY 2025

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

Interfering with rights of access

What constitutes substantial interference with enjoyment of an easement?

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction

A balancing act where reasonableness must prevail

The NSW Supreme Court recently heard two cases relating to rights of carriage way and rights of access, and the activities that may be carried out by the parties benefiting from or burdened by these easements.

In both cases, importance was placed on ensuring that:

  • the owner of the land burdened by these rights (the servient tenement owner; henceforth "the burdened owner") does not substantially interfere with a benefitted party's enjoyment of them
  • the party benefitting from these rights (a prescribed authority or the dominant tenement owner; henceforth "the benefitted owner") does not engage in activities that unreasonably interfere with the servient tenement owner's use of the land.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from