Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 AUGUST 2012

Dempsey v Brisbane City Council [2012] QPEC 2

An Application for Orders that changes to a development proposal were a minor change for the purpose of s.350 of SPA.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction

Whether change to proposed development a minor change – multi-unit dwelling – words and phrases "substantial" - s.350 Sustainable Planning Act 2009

Facts: This was an Application for Orders that changes to a development proposal constituted a minor change for the purpose of s.350 of SPA.

The appeal concerned an Application for a multi-unit dwelling. The more substantive changes were identified as the reduction in the number of storeys from 6 to 4, a reduction in the number of units from 6 to 4, and a reduction in GFA of about 32%.

Decision: The Court held that the changes to the proposed development were a minor change:

  1. While there was reference to "additional" impacts in the Statutory Guideline, when reference was made to the scale, bulk and appearance of a development it was not restricted to only increases, but was concerned with changes to the built form in terms of scale, bulk and appearance.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from