Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 JUNE 2018

Compulsory acquisition of land: Lessons to be learnt from the Desane case

Holding Redlich
Holding Redlich
Contributor
Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich is a large national commercial firm with offices in Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Holding Redlich

This case reinforces the necessity for authorities to acquire the land in strict accordance with statutory procedure.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction

The Supreme Court of NSW has recently upheld a challenge brought by property developer, Desane, against an attempt by Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) to acquire its land for the WestConnex motorway project.1

In May 2017, RMS served a Proposed Acquisition Notice (PAN) upon Desane which would enable RMS to compulsorily acquire Desane's property by 1 September 2017. However, Desane did not want to surrender the property to RMS and subsequently applied to the Court seeking a declaration that the PAN was invalid.

Essentially, Desane argued that the PAN was ineffective because:

  • it did not comply with the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (Just Terms Act) as it was not in the approved form

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from