Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 JULY 2014

Can informal property transaction arrangements be binding?

Property developers and investors should be aware of these issues when trying to finalise a 'pre-contract' arrangement:.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction
Bernard Tan (Formerly With ClarkeKann Lawyers)
Bernard Tan (Formerly With ClarkeKann Lawyers)
Author LinkedIn connections

Due to the commercial imperatives of property dealings, parties may try to 'lock' in an agreement by signing letters of offer or heads of agreement. In a strong competitive property market, contracts may also be signed and exchanged via email. While each case will depend on its circumstances, there are a number of 'rules of thumb' that property developers and investors should keep in mind when trying to secure a transaction under a 'pre-contract' arrangement:

DON'T ASSUME THAT INFORMAL AGREEMENTS ARE BINDING EVEN IF THEY SAY THEY ARE:

There is a presumption by the Courts that such informal arrangements are not binding. They will often not comply with specific State-based property law requirements such as mandatory disclosure, which may give rise to rescission rights. If you wish to lock in a deal, then don't count on your informal arrangement to be legally binding.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from