Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 FEBRUARY 2013

Call Option Nominations - Poor Drafting Can Hurt

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Call options over land are well understood commercially but often the legal effect is not, so clear drafting is crucial.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction

Call options over land are well understood commercially but the legal effect of the documents is the subject of controversy and clear drafting is crucial.

This is not just a theoretical issue. Of particular significance is the flexible mechanism by which a nominee can be appointed to exercise an option. Drafting impacts whether a nominee is duly appointed and in what capacity the nominee acts, namely: as principal or agent.

Unclear drafting can also have adverse stamp duty consequences, as emphasised by the decision of Gzell J in CTI Joint Venture Company Pty Ltd v. Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2013] NSWSC 20. The case involved the appointment of a nominee under a call option over land in New South Wales.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from