Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 SEPTEMBER 2024

Another LEG3 decision from the United States

Both the SCB and Archer decisions tend to support a view that the US courts struggle with applying LEG3.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction

The South Capital Bridgebuilders v Lexington Insurance Company [29.09.23] (SCB), a District of Columbia decision was shortly thereafter applied in another case involving sub-par concrete and the interpretation of LEG 3, namely Archer Western – De Moya Joint Venture v Ace American Insurance Company [12.01.24] (Archer Western), a Floridan decision.

As with SCB, the Archer Western case did not deal with the issues Kennedys' have raised with LEG3 over the years, but instead opined on, and evidenced the US courts view, of what is regarded as damage for the purposes of an insurance claim on a construction project.

Here, the insured was the design and build contractor for the reconstruction of a major road in Miami, Florida. Insurers issued a builder's risk (CAR) policy to the design-build contractor which contained a LEG 3 clause.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from