Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 JULY 2009

“When Can A Nominee Sue On The Contract?”

A recent Federal Court decision concerning the sale of a licensed hotel illustrates some of the difficulties a nominee purchaser may confront when they try to sue on the contract.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction

A recent Federal Court decision concerning the sale of a licensed hotel illustrates some of the difficulties a nominee purchaser may confront when they try to sue on the contract.

In Avzur Hotels Pty Ltd v Ivanhoe Entertainment Pty Ltd1 the Court determined, as a separate issue before trial, whether a nominee under a contract for the sale of a licensed hotel business could sue the vendor. The nominee claimed the vendor had breached certain warranties relating to the financial performance of the business.

The Court was asked to decide whether the contract of sale permitted the appointment of a substitute purchaser for, or in addition to, the named purchaser, or whether the nomination was no more than a direction to the vendor to transfer the business to the nominee.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from