Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 SEPTEMBER 2026

Privacy Lessons For Victorian Government Agencies From The Bunnings Decision

Holding Redlich
Holding Redlich
Contributor
Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich is a large national commercial firm with offices in Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Holding Redlich

The Administrative Review Tribunal's decision on Bunnings' use of Facial Recognition Technology offers critical insights for Victorian government agencies collecting sensitive information through new technologies. This analysis examines how privacy governance failures, inadequate notification practices, and insufficient transparency led to regulatory breaches, and explores what public sector organisations must do to strengthen their compliance frameworks when implementing surveillance systems or collecting

AustraliaPrivacy

The Administrative Review Tribunal’s decision on Bunnings’ use of Facial Recognition Technology (FRT) in February this year may have gone under the radar for government lawyers given the affected organisation was a retail giant and the scenario appeared unrelated to the day-to-day activities of a Victorian government agency.

However, the decision contains important lessons for Victorian public sector organisations that collect sensitive or delicate information, particularly where new technologies are involved or obtaining explicit consent may not be practicable.

While the decision was considered under the Commonwealth Privacy Act and the Australian Privacy Principles (APPs), the Tribunal’s findings regarding transparency, governance and notification obligations are also relevant to Victorian public sector organisations subject to the Privacy and Data Protection Act 2014 (Vic) (PDP Act) and the Information Privacy Principles (IPPs).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

This publication does not deal with every important topic or change in law and is not intended to be relied upon as a substitute for legal or other advice that may be relevant to the reader's specific circumstances. If you have found this publication of interest and would like to know more or wish to obtain legal advice relevant to your circumstances please contact one of the named individuals listed.

See more popular content from