Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 SEPTEMBER 2010

Psychological Injuries – No Requirement that A Worker’s Perception of Events Be "Reasonable"

Acting President Bill Roche of the Workers compensation Commission of NSW (‘WCC’) dismissed an appeal lodged by an employer against the decision of the Arbitrator to award a worker benefits of weekly compensation and treatment expenses as a result of a psychological injury.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Attorney General's Department v K [2010] NSWWCCPD 76 (21 July 2010)

Acting President Bill Roche of the Workers compensation Commission of NSW ('WCC') dismissed an appeal lodged by an employer against the decision of the Arbitrator to award a worker benefits of weekly compensation and treatment expenses as a result of a psychological injury. The decision emphasises that there is no requirement at law that a worker's perception of events must pass some 'qualitative test of reasonableness' in order to establish an entitlement to compensation.

Background

The worker commenced proceedings in the WCC alleging that she had sustained a psychological injury as a result of an excessive workload, chronic pain associated with a (work related) foot injury and harassment in the workplace.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from