Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 JULY 2020

Plaintiff lawyers ordered to pay $140,000 to insurer

This recent decision was a reminder to lawyers that their first duty is to the court and the administration of justice.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

A recent decision of the Queensland Magistrates' Court provides a stark reminder to lawyers that their first duty is to the court and the administration of justice rather than to their clients.

In Kim v Han and AAI Limited M4136/8, a magistrate considered the issue of legal costs to be awarded in the aftermath of judgement having been given against a plaintiff after a failed compulsory third-party motor vehicle personal injury claim.

The court was critical of both the plaintiff and his lawyers regarding the way the litigation was conducted, for attempts to hide or destroy critical evidence and for the running of the case at all.

The magistrate found that the plaintiff had downplayed injuries suffered in earlier accidents.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from