Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 DECEMBER 2014

Lease dispute arbitration award appeal denied

While the outcome in this case was a very clear victory for the landlord, certainly lessons need to be taken from it.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In a decision of Chief Justice Wayne Martin of the Supreme Court of Western Australia published 30 September 2014, 2 applications by the tenant of a substantial retail shop seeking leave to appeal the award of an arbitrator of a retail shop lease dispute were dismissed. Mark Fatharly of Kott Gunning appeared as counsel for the defendant landlord successful in both the arbitration and the Supreme Court hearing.

The citation for the decision is Solid Gold Jewellers Pty Ltd v Winston Holdings Pty Ltd [2014] WASC 361.

By way of background, the landlord leased newly renovated premises to the tenant in Perth, the lease containing an arbitration clause. One aspect of dispute the subject of the applications for leave had arisen from findings of the arbitrator about the standard of fire sprinkler system which the landlord had been required to install in the context of the lease terms and the fact that the premises were intended to be used for retail purposes.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from