Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 DECEMBER 2010

Indefeasibility and fraud: a silver bullet or a poisoned chalice?

The recent decision of the NSW Supreme Court in MDN Mortgages Pty Limited v Caradonna [2010] NSWSC 1298 provides further comfort for lenders that an allegation of fraud will not necessarily compromise the lender’s position as a mortgagee.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The recent decision of the NSW Supreme Court in MDN Mortgages Pty Limited v Caradonna [2010] NSWSC 1298 provides further comfort for lenders that an allegation of fraud will not necessarily compromise the lender's position as a mortgagee.

Facts

In November 2004, MDN Mortgages Pty Limited (MDN) advanced a loan of $320,000 to Caradonna Investments Pty Limited (Company) secured by, among other things:

  • a personal guarantee signed by Maria Antonietta Caradonna (Mrs Caradonna) on account of the Company (Guarantee); and
  • a mortgage granted by Mrs Caradonna (Mortgage) over her home at Bonnyrigg (Property).

The Company was controlled by Mrs Caradonna's son. The loan proceeds were used to pay out a prior mortgage over the Property (Prior Mortgage) held by Magney Mortgages Pty Limited (Magney).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from