Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 MAY 2023

Expert evidence: New Aim Pty Ltd v Leung [2023] FCAFC 67

From a draft report, lawyers must take care to ensure that they do not suggest what the expert's evidence would be.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

New Aim Pty Ltd v Leung [2023] FCAFC 67

In a long awaited appeal decision, the Full Court of the Federal Court has found that the primary judge in New Aim Pty Ltd v Leung [2022] FCA 722 (the Reasons) erred in rejecting the entirety of the evidence of New Aim Pty Ltd's expert, Ms C based on factual findings concerning the preparation of the expert report.

The Full Court ruled that the reasoning adopted by McElwaine J at first instance for the rejection of the opinion evidence provided by Ms C contained factual errors and errors of approach which, if they had not occurred, might well have resulted in the evidence of Ms C not being rejected.

Background

New Aim, an Australian ecommerce business, alleged that several of its former employees had shared identity and contact details of its Chinese suppliers, which New Aim identified as confidential information.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from