Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 MARCH 2026

Case Review (Misfeasance in public office): Kitchen v Quinlivan (No 3)

A court found that a government official committed misfeasance in public office by failing to genuinely consider a doctor’s detailed submission before making a career-destroying decision, resulting in nearly $2 million in damages.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

PLAINTIFF: Dr David Kitchen, ophthalmologist, and his practice CQ Eye Pty Ltd

DEFENDANT: Julie Quinlivan, Director of Professional Services Review Agency (PSR). The PSR agency administers the PSR Scheme to investigate Medicare-referred cases of possible inappropriate practice relating to Medicare, the CDBS and the PBS. Most commonly, the PSR agency investigates doctors suspected of "inappropriate practice" – billing Medicare incorrectly or excessively.

CLAIM: Misfeasance in public office. Misfeasance in public office is an intentional common law tort occurring when a public officer abuses their authority, causing foreseeable loss, with either malice or reckless indifference. It requires proving the officer acted in bad faith, knowing they lacked power or were harming the plaintiff.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from