Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 JULY 2020

Bunnings found to be a shop not a shopping centre

Recent case reminds councils to make sure that they are clear in the wording of differential rates categories.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On 19 May 2020, the Court of Appeal delivered judgment in BWP Management Limited & Anor v Ipswich City Council [2020] QCA 104. The case, which had already been through the Land Court and the Land Court of Appeal, was simple in its premise – for the purpose of the levying of Council differential rates, should two Bunnings stores in the Ipswich area be properly categorised by Ipswich City Council (Council) as 'Drive-In Shopping Centre', or 'Shop – Single' as the Applicant contended. Unsurprisingly, the Applicant's position would result in lower Council rates for the Bunnings stores.

In Council's budget, 'Shop' was not defined, but 'Drive-In Shopping Centre' was defined to mean:

'a premises or a cluster of premises that:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from