Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 NOVEMBER 2020

A search order in Queensland is extraordinary and not a mere investigatory tool

Qld Court of Appeal dismissed appeal against the refusal of an application seeking a search order under rule 261A of the UCPR.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In brief

The case of Adani Mining Pty Ltd & Anor v Pennings [2020] QCA 169 concerned an appeal to the Queensland Court of Appeal against the refusal of an application seeking a search order under  rule 261A of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999  (UCPR). 

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal on the basis that a search order was an extraordinary exercise of the Court's jurisdiction and held that the evidence before it was "wholly inadequate to justify the order sought" (at [22]). 

Brief background

Adani Mining Pty Ltd is the developer of a coal mine in the Galilee Basin in Queensland, and Carmichael Rail Network Pty Ltd is the developer of an associated railway line (the Appellants). The Respondent is the principal of a group of political activists whose object is to prevent the development of the mine and associated railway line. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from