Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 DECEMBER 2021

Tripping over the doormat: Basic threshold issues to get right in trade mark litigation

These judgments were a lesson for practitioners to get the basics right in trade mark infringement proceedings.

AustraliaIntellectual Property

The dismissal of the PDP Group's (PDP) special leave application to the High Court1 on 9 December 2021 is a timely reminder for practitioners to get the basics right in trade mark infringement proceedings. The fundamental basics that are really trade mark litigation 101 include:

  1. ensuring that the party enforcing a trade mark actually owns the mark;
  2. commencing proceedings for infringement against the correct parties; and
  3. ensuring that the pleading includes all necessary causes of action.

In respect of all these points, PDF failed wickedly.

In a resounding win for Grasshopper Ventures Pty Ltd (Grasshopper) over PDP's ill conceived and fundamentally flawed case, the High Court supported two lower Federal Court decisions in dismissing PDP's claims of trade mark infringement, misleading or deceptive conduct, passing off, and most of the claims for rectification of the Trade Mark Register for some classes of Grasshopper's mark.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from