Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 MARCH 2026

Strategy and lessons from recent interlocutory injunctions in trade mark and passing off disputes

Brand owners need to be alert to the practical realities of enforcement, including the impact of delay, the quality of evidence required, and the commercial consequences of seeking urgent relief.

AustraliaIntellectual Property

In December 2025 the Australian Federal Court considered two applications for interlocutory (or preliminary) injunctions in branding disputes: Prezzee Pty Ltd v Epay Australia Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 1662 and Lindrum v T&P Lindrum Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 1644.

Why was the Prezzee injunction granted, when the Lindrum injunction was not? We break down the factors that contributed to these very different legal results and consider: what lessons can be learned?

Key lessons for brand owners in a TM dispute

  • There are significant practical advantage of owning a registered trade mark when seeking urgent relief;
  • Before stopping a product launch or requiring a rebrand midstream, the Court will expect to see cogent evidence of the perceived damage, and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from