Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 JULY 2016

Royalty-free impermanence, disembodied copyright

The increasing use of digitised transmission or data signals leaves the images and sounds without copyright protection.

AustraliaIntellectual Property

Royalty-free impermanence, disembodied copyright – tax win, but copyright loss for un-broadcasted signals in the Commissioner of Taxation v Seven Network Limited [2016] FCAFC 70

In a decision that somehow brings together the Olympics, copyright, Switzerland and the subtler points of tax law, the Full Federal Court has further dissected what can and cannot be protected as a film under copyright laws. Upholding the first instance decision of Justice Bennett, the Full Federal Court has confirmed that data signals carrying images and sounds will not enjoy copyright protection as "cinematographic films" under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). The decision is an important alert to broadcasters and media stakeholders that the increasing use of digitised transmission or data signals leaves the images and sounds without copyright protection – at least until a broadcast is made. On the up side, the absence of copyright protection in the data signals may offer a pleasant tax break

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from