Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 SEPTEMBER 2016

Registered designs: What is the appropriate form of order for injunctive relief?

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

This judge granted an injunction in broad terms, consistent with the usual trade mark and copyright infringement orders.

AustraliaIntellectual Property
Elizabeth Duncan (Formerly With Corrs Chambers Westgarth)
Elizabeth Duncan (Formerly With Corrs Chambers Westgarth)
Author LinkedIn connections

Intellectual property lawyers will be very familiar with the usual form of order for the injunctive relief awarded in trade mark infringement cases. It extends to any name, word, mark, sign or device 'substantially identical with or deceptively similar to' the registered mark in suit. In registered design cases, on the other hand, the appropriate form of order is not so clear.

In NSW, a decision by the Federal Court in Multisteps v Source and Sell [2013] FCA 743 has been influential in suggesting that injunctive relief in registered design cases should be limited to the specific products alleged to infringe.

However, a more recent decision in Hunter Pacific International Pty Ltd v Martec Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] FCA 1041 saw Justice Nicholas grant an injunction in broad terms, consistent with the usual form of order in trade mark and copyright infringement cases.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from