Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 FEBRUARY 2011

Narrow win for iiNet

John Fairbain explains the iiNet decision and ISP's liability for users' copyright infringements to Boardroom Radio

AustraliaIntellectual Property

David Bushby:  We're speaking with John Fairbairn, a partner in the Intellectual Property Group at Clayton Utz in Sydney. A warm welcome to Boardroom Radio John.

Yesterday we saw the Full Federal Court hand down its long-awaited decision in the iiNet case for intellectual property infringement brought by film studios.  What was the outcome?

John Fairbairn: Well in a 2:1 decision (there were three judges) iiNet won.  The Full Court in effect agreed that iiNet was not liable for the copyright infringement of its users but its victory was not as absolute as it was at first instance.

David Bushby: So what were the key findings in this one? 

John Fairbairn: I think there were probably four elements to it.  The first is there is no absolute defence for ISPs to allegations of copyright infringement. The reasoning at first instance was that ISPs didn't provide the means of infringement, they merely provided access to the internet; the Full Court rejected that

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from