Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 APRIL 2023

High Court Wrinkles BOTOX Trade Mark

In Self Care IP Holdings Pty Ltd v Allergan Australia Pty Ltd [2023] HCA 8, Allergan failed in its attempt to prevent use of the phrase "instant Botox® alternative", and use of the trade mark PROTOX.

AustraliaIntellectual Property

In Self Care IP Holdings Pty Ltd v Allergan Australia Pty Ltd [2023] HCA 8, Allergan failed in its attempt to prevent use of the phrase "instant Botox® alternative", and use of the trade mark PROTOX.

What was the Issue?

  • Self Care used the phrase "instant Botox® alternative" on its packaging and its website as a trade mark (examples below)
    1304178a.jpg
  • Self Care also used the trade mark PROTOX (example below)
    1304178b.jpg
  • Allergan objected to the unauthorised use of its BOTOX trade mark and to use of the PROTOX trade mark

What did Allergan claim?

  • That use of "instant Botox® alternative" infringed its BOTOX trade mark registrations.
  • That BOTOX and PROTOX are deceptively similar, meaning that use of PROTOX infringed its BOTOX trade mark registrations.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from