Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 DECEMBER 2015

Happy royalties to you

Until recently, using the full Happy Birthday song would mean paying royalties to the purported owner of the copyright.

AustraliaIntellectual Property

The reason film and television makers avoid using the full song is that until recently doing so would mean that they would have to pay royalties to the purported owner of the copyright of the song, Warner/Chappell Music. Despite the fact that anyone above the age of 3 can pretty well bang out their own rendition, licensing it for commercial use costs, in fact, it's estimated that the various owners of the song have leveraged over US $50 million in royalties since it was composed in 1912 by two Kentucky sisters.

This all seems to be changing now that a United States Court has found that music publishing company Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. does not own the copyright of the Happy Birthday song. This marks the end of decades of Warner/Chappell claiming millions for licensing the song for commercial use.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from