Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 MAY 2020

Former Employee Loses Patent Ownership Dispute

A recent decision by the Australian Patent Office demonstrates the risks of filing a patent application for an invention that one was not responsible for conceiving.

AustraliaIntellectual Property

A recent decision by the Australian Patent Office demonstrates the risks of filing a patent application for an invention that one was not responsible for conceiving. The decision of Vuly Pty Ltd v Wei Yang [2020] APO 13, delivered on 28 February 2020, resulted in a patent applicant losing ownership of his patent applications to his ex-employer after it was found that he had learned of the concept behind the invention from two work emails that had been sent to him.

Background

The parties in the present dispute were Vuly Pty Ltd (Vuly), a company that designed and manufactured trampolines, and Wei Yang, a mechanical engineer and former employee of Vuly.

In July 2014, four months after the end of his employment at Vuly, Mr Yang filed a Chinese patent application for a trampoline with a distinctive support frame designed to provide improved structural integrity. He subsequently filed a PCT application and two Australian patent applications claiming priority from

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from