Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 JUNE 2018

Beer wars: Was it a case of passing off? Pacific Ale v Thunder Road Pacific

This case suggests that, in certain circumstances, competitors may use similar, almost identical, phrases in marketing.

AustraliaIntellectual Property
Karina Wong (Formerly With Bryks Lawyers)
Karina Wong (Formerly With Bryks Lawyers)
Author LinkedIn connections

Stone & Wood's claims of passing off and Australian Consumer Law (ACL) contraventions against its rival in craft beer, Elixir, were rejected on appeal in Stone & Wood Group Pty Ltd v Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd [2018] FCAFC 29. The Full Federal Court decided that Elixir's use of the name 'Thunder Road Pacific Ale' (later 'Thunder Road Pacific') for one of its craft beer varieties did not constitute passing off in relation to Stone & Wood's craft beer named 'Pacific Ale'. The Court also held that Elixir's use of the name did not constitute misleading or deceptive conduct or false or misleading representations under the ACL.

This recent decision holds significant implications for businesses as it suggests that, in certain circumstances, competitors may freely use similar, almost identical, phrases in marketing their goods and services.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from