Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 JULY 2010

Trial Judge's Finding of "motor accident" Upheld on Appeal

When considering whether the factual circumstances of a case satisfy the definition of a 'motor accident" within the meaning of s 3 of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (MAC Act), a trial judge is permitted to draw inferences from the evidence which is given or, as in this case, not given.

AustraliaInsurance

Judgment date: 28 June 2010

New South Wales Court of Appeal1

In Brief

  • When considering whether the factual circumstances of a case satisfy the definition of a "motor accident" within the meaning of s 3 of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (MAC Act), a trial judge is permitted to draw inferences from the evidence which is given or, as in this case, not given.
  • If the factual circumstances of a case involve the unloading of freight via a forklift and the evidence favours a finding that the negligent use or operation of the forklift caused injury, it is likely the provisions of s 3 of the MAC Act will be found to be satisfied.

Background

Mr Cui Ngo was employed by Ron Lai Plastic Co Pty Limited as a delivery driver. On 9 February 2006 he collected a plastic extrusion machine, which was approximately 1.5 metres high, 1.5 metres round and 400 to 500kg in weight, in his truck. The machine was situated on a pallet and loaded onto his truck by a

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from