Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 DECEMBER 2016

The narrow compass for reasonable care and precautions conditions to operate

A review of these authorities is a useful reminder of the very limited circumstances under which the conditions operate.

AustraliaInsurance

There has recently been some litigation in higher courts concerning conditions in insurance policies requiring an insured to take reasonable care or precautions to prevent loss or damage. A review of these authorities is a useful reminder of the very limited circumstances under which these conditions operate.

In April 2016, the NSW Court of Appeal (NSWCA) handed down its decision in Barrie Toepfer Earthmoving and Land Management Pty Ltd v CGU Insurance Ltd [2016] NSWCA 67 (Barrie Toepfer). This case concerned damage to a bridge caused when an excavator, carried on a prime mover, struck several spans of the bridge. As the owner of the bridge, the RTA brought proceedings against Barrie Toepfer Earthmoving and Land Management Pty Ltd (Toepfer), claiming damages for the cost of repair. Toepfer's employee, Mr Luck, had been driving the prime mover when the accident occurred.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from