Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 NOVEMBER 2014

The importance of good process when assessing a TPD claim

The "Relevant Legal Principles" create a pathway to determining what is real and what is theoretical in TPD cases.

AustraliaInsurance

In a claim for total and permanent disability (TPD), insurers often grapple with the distinction between what is real and what is theoretical when determining whether someone is capable of performing work by reason of education, training and experience. In the recent case Birdsall v Motor Trades Association of Australia Superannuation Fund Pty Limited, Justice Hallen gives life insurers some guidance in making this determination.

Background

In this matter, Mr Birdsall (the plaintiff) suffered an injury to his right wrist when he was lifting a heavy gearbox in the course of his employment in February 2009. The plaintiff was paid workers' compensation benefits. The plaintiff attempted to undertake various periods of restricted duties and ultimately ceased work with the employer on 4 October 2010. The plaintiff was a member of the MTAA Super Fund. The trustee (the first defendant) took out a policy with the insurer who was the second defendant in the proceedings. The

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from